New season gives way with new field

To clear up any confusion, here's all the games and rankings I have for this current season:

05-07-06
Game 3- Dearner, Morris, Todd (2 Ball)
winner: Todd, Todd, Dearner, Dearner, Morris, Morris

05-15-06
Game 1- Morris, Todd, Mark, Toe, Dante, Jeff (1 Ball) (Bourg Party)
winner: Morris, Mark, Jeff, Todd, Dante, Toe

05-16-06
*Championship*- Jumpy, Todd (3 Ball)
winner: Todd, Todd, Jumpy, Todd, Jumpy, Jumpy

Game 1- Jumpy, Morris, Todd (2 Ball)
winner: Jumpy, Jumpy, Morris, Morris, Todd, Todd

05-17-06
Game 1- Jake, Jumpy, Mark, Morris, Todd (1 Ball) (New Course)
winner: Todd, Jumpy, Morris, Mark, Jake

Game 2- Jake, Jumpy, Mark, Morris, Todd (1 Ball)
winner: Jake, Jumpy, Morris, Todd, Mark *check*

The championship went pretty well, as in your typical Battle of the Somme (WW I). Todd picked up the title, and thus that means he has a bottle coming to him. As far as the new course goes, I think we're all in agreement that its pretty freaking cool. Not only is it regulation, but more private, and 10x more difficult do to the terrain change. Everyone glance over the last two games to make sure I have the correct order.

A palindrome that ends with "Todd" ... and a "Christening"

"winner: Jake, Todd, Jumpy, Jumpy, Todd, Jake"

This means, as we now know, that Todd and Jumpy advance to the final. And for those of us who have the foresight to know better (or for those who witnessed the 'blessing'), this particular phrase ends with "Todd."

That is to say, Todd ultimately rallied the season, trumping the now-two-time-runner-up, Jumpy in the final championship threeball game.

Along with the win of the season, of course, comes the inaugural play on the new, regulation field. The Christening went well, with the two game winners being Jumpy and Todd, and Jake and Jumpy, respectively with respect to games played.

I'm sure that last item was misunderstood. But we will talk about that later..

Semi Final Results

It was definately a great game. A big thank-you for everyone that came out.

Jake, Jumpy, Todd (2 Ball)
winner: Jake, Todd, Jumpy, Jumpy, Todd, Jake

The game was definately close. While Jumpy got one of his balls in early, the course of the game made it really close. From what I understand it really came down to the rover (which Im a huge fan) and a great shot from Todd.

So the final 3 Ball Championship game will be Todd and Jumpy. Im hoping this can happen Tuesday. Good luck to everyone. Bourg party tomorrow. Winner of the championship gets a bottle of wine supplied by the other three players.

Bourg. Party

Okay, Ive said before the Bourg party basically cant happen on the 19th (at least at my house). So the date needs to be moved up. I suggest something as soon as Monday. Anyone else have a say?

Statement

After getting support from Jake for whatever desicion I make he will accept, and conferring with Todd I humbly put forth my proposition. I reluctantly want to make an administrative choice. I made an administrative choice when I decided to ban (along with a majority vote) the "Assassin Ball", or as it has become known now as "ass ball". I put forth my reasons why, and the USCA and Sooner Croquet players agreed with me. However, in this finals desicion, I do not claim property of the feild as my authority. But that I am the only one that does not have some motive for what should happen.

There are good reasons for each proposition. There is a good argument for extending the season to 20 games (which we have), and good reasons for who should play in the final. Becuase each senario has its own reasons (I assume they have been addressed suffiently in other posts) for why who should play, it makes an objective reason difficult to arrive at.

I therefore, throw my wieght (as essentially an outsider) behind Jake, Jumpy, and Todd all play a 2 ball semi final game. The purpose of us meeting together has always been to enjoy each others company and also enjoy sport. I feel this situation, where three players basically decide by their own merits, is the best one. The two finishers will then play a championship. I hope everyone knows that I have thought about what senario would be best, and I hope no ill will is taken in my desicion. As said before, becuase this particular situation is so difficult, I see this as the most fair way to solve this. I also would hope to think that the spirit of why we have played together for so long, and so loyally, with each other is that the spirit of enjoying fraternity amongst ourselves is strong. If you do not agree with me, please answer with your reasons. Any dissention is welcomed, but for the reasons stated above I believe this is the best way to solve our issue.

Again, whatever the outcome, the players of Sooner Croquet have stuck together, through rain, drought, snow, darkness, and outstanding circumstances. I hope for the summer season to continue to hold these qualities that have sustained us for so long.

Final Tally

Okay, I tallied the 15 game stats, and then the 20 game stats.

15 Games
Jake: 39/48= 81.25%
Jumpy: 51/72= 70.83%
Morris: 60/90= 66.67%
Todd: 60/78= 76.9%

20 Games:

Jake: 62/78= 79.49% **
Jumpy: 64/90= 71.11%
Morris: 81/120= 67.5%
Todd: 84/108= 77.78%

**However, if you take Todd's 'bring the up to 75%', then Jake does a

62/90= 68.89% (oh geez, he's still beating me)

However, I'm not a real big fan of this. On the other hand purposefully extending a season becuase a player chose to not play enough games. If we're going to do that, then why not extend the season until I'm in second? I do however, accept that making a season 20 games makes it easier to remember that you need 15. This also provides a richer demographic.

Also notice that not a lot changes from 15 to 20 games. I think you could argue that since Jake is out of standing a playoff of Jake, Jumpy, and Todd could be played. This situation isn't that fair to Todd, since he really is has the most to lose, or the only one. Otherwise, a Jake/Jumpy playoff could be had, then the winner play Todd***. Or just do a Todd/Jake final. I hesitate to reveal the scores when there needs to be a descion , but I trust you can make an objective opinion. Post or comment what you think should happen, and why.

***This all assumes Jumpy ever comes back, or answers his phone, or gives any signals he's alive.

Less Jumpy= Extra fun!

Well Jumpy was unable to make it today. Too bad for him, becuase the Greek House doesn't come around handing out free gyros everyday, and then when the Johnnie Walker rep came and played with us, then gave us a few extra bottles of Blue, Green, & Gold labels. Truly, even excluding the Oriental cheerleaders, the day was one of super fun. Anyway, heres the stats:

05-07-06
Game 1- Dearner, Jake, Morris, Todd (1 Ball)
winner: Todd, Jake, Dearner, Morris

Game 2- Dearner, Jake, Morris, Todd (1 Ball)
winner: Todd, Morris, Jake, Dearner

Game 3- Dearner, Morris, Todd (2 Ball)
winner: Todd, Todd, Dearner, Dearner, Morris, Morris

Regarding the Bourg. game. Todd mentioned how he would like to have a "Good Bye" game to the course that has given so much to us, I agree. However, we also should have a "Hello, Nice to Meet You" party for the new course. Unfortunately, since my evil roommates are moving me out early, playing on the 19th is screwed. The house will have no electricity, no running water, and pretty much moved out of. So the Bourg Good Bye party will have to be held at an earlier time. And yes, white is in this season.

Comment! Post! Comment! Post!

Re: "Bourg," Vindication, and Season

Re: Season

My motion for increasing the requisite game count for a season to 20 games stands. The rationale is twofold: 1) We readily fit 15 games before the end of the season. 2) 75% of 20 is more readily accessible to the mathematically-challenged of our players (the answer is 15), which simplifies the process of determining the eligibility of any one player.

Re: Vindication

Support from the Croquet community is backing Morris. While a legalistic viewpoint puts Master Jake in the right, the "gentlemanly" argument carries a lot of weight with me. A player "A" that goes "rogue" for the purpose of conspiring with another player "B" in an effort to boost the odds of a win for "B" does smack of ungentlemanly conduct.

Re: "Bourg"

White is in season, isn't it? Morris's motion for cocktail croquet by tiki light is hereby seconded.

Bourg. Party

Since we've gotten the rain, and hopefully more is coming, it seems we may be able to have night games again. I know what your all thinking- Bourgeoisie Party! Yeah, I was too. I have to move out by the 20th if we want to do it here, I think the 19th is a Friday. Gin, ties, bowties, etc.

Think of it as a kickoff to the Third Season (if we vote it in).

Vindication

On my post after Sundays game I rehashed my reasons against the Assassin Ball as being legal. Apparently Im friends with a bunch of legalistic hardnoses, Tocqueville is rolling in his grave. Anyway, I began to wonder if my action to just outright ban the AB practice as a personal field rule was overkill. But then I decided to seek higher authorities. Here is the response I got:

Hi Chris,

My name is Bob Kroeger, I am chairperson of the USCA 9 Wicket Croquet Committee. You are correct in saying that the action this person takes in giving his balls to an opponent is inappropriate.
If I was running an event and heard of this taking place, I would disqualify them for this action.

If I can be of any further assistance to you, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Sincerely,
Bob Kroeger

(end transmission)

So beyond my own personal protests, the full weight of the USCA is behind my (correct) descion. So since the USCA has this opinion, I resend my initial private rule, as it is a REAL rule.

P.S. And Blogger has been acting really weird today, so Im not sure what has made it on here or not. Hopefully my previous post and this one will make it up.

Season 2...or 3?

Okay, I have come up on a third option for what we should do.

Possibility 3: Take the top 2 scores from the first 15 games, and they play for the season final. I had ran this senario before, the top 2 are actually kinda close, where the bottom two are actually close to each other.

Theres also the other 2 options that are laid out in the previous post. Here they are for your viewing pleasure:

Possibility 1: Cut off at fifteen games. Since Jake is out of standing, just play a (whether 1 or 2 ball) semi-final game. Then, the top two players then play the final.

Possibility 2: Extend the season five more games, this would give Jake a higher standing.


Comment or blog your response, explain why you think we should do what option. I'd like to have this resolved by the next time we play. Which by how its been going is 1 game and maybe 45 minutes long. Again, I want to commend our club for being so dedicated.

Also, other people are actually allowed to post on this, just to clear up any confusion. Actually, it would make it better.